SUZY SPREADWELL #1 by John Linton Roberson, available at Google Play Books!
I Didn't Write That!
30 September 2010
  Obama's Gen44 Speech Today

Well, all right then, sir. That's more the kind of thing we're talking about. Keep that up. That, there, that thing you're doing.

Then carry through in policy if we manage to keep your majorities for you.

Labels: , ,

 
  Who's More Dangerous, Beck or O'Reilly?

Sullivan here makes the argument that, bad as Glenn Beck is, it's a completely different species of bad from the insidious propaganda of Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity. I can see the argument, only in that no one could ever mistake Beck for "reasonable," whereas, for instance, BO seems that way to many(in fact, particularly now compared TO Beck, even Jon Stewart--wrong more often than previously lately--thinks O'Reilly is the "adult" in the room there. Well yes, and Trinity was the adult in his household; your point?) and therefore communicates to far more people than Beck really can. Beck is a straight-up huckster and there's an upper limit to how many he can fool, but not so with Fox's approach otherwise. It's a bit like the difference between Newt Gingrich and, say, Fred Phelps. There are plenty of reasonable people who would give the vile, cynical manipulator Gingrich a hearing, and might think he had a point, while even if Fred Phelps got TV time he's only going to appeal to the most bigoted, most paranoid, most hateful parts of the population. Gingrich is more dangerous in the discourse, in a broader sense, because he might actually affect policy. But just the same, Phelps could get people killed. But there's still a ceiling to his influence, thankfully a very low one in his case.

But that's narrow Beltway thinking. Beck's still dangerous, just in a different way, in that he stirs up the violent crazies and does fool them, even if he could never fool anyone else.

Labels: , , , , ,

 
28 September 2010
  Dexter: The Real Tragedy of Rita

I mean, apart from the fact that Dexter indirectly caused her, in his words in a eulogy(!), "brutal death" at the hands of John Lithgow's Trinity Killer(possibly one of Lithgow's more committed, and definitely most frightening, performances).

Rita was annoying
, to most fans of Dexter and to myself, though acted quite well. The problem was that she became fairly one-note once her criminal ex-husband was out of the picture. From that point onward she gives the appearance of one-note yammering about whatever self-help book or TV show she saw that day, all focused on becoming the most perfect suburban middle-class family, acting in every way as such people are supposed to do.

But if you shift perspective, there's an aspect to this that Dexter and, I think, even the writers may have missed. They never seemed that interested in Rita's inner life, though they're certainly interested in Deb's, and Rita's kiss with the neighbor was almost the only thing that she was given to do that, at least at that moment, didn't relate directly to Dexter's point of view. And Deb's inner life is, pretty much, her relationships with Dexter and the "wrong men" she keeps sleeping with, either twisted or doomed. Basically, they were given inner lives insofar as sex was related.

But here's what I think is missed about Rita, and that signifies lost opportunities with her. Why is Dexter, initially, with her? Because she's good cover for his activities. Then, slowly, he gets sucked more earnestly into domestic life. But one major theme with Dexter Morgan is his attempt to seem as normal as he can, and so he tries to learn what humans consider normal things to do so that he can act the part as well as he can, believing himself to lack humanity and empathy, and a grounding in thinking of any of this as a given the way "normal" people do. This, however, isn't so much meant toward getting a happier life as it is--at first--to facilitate his hobby of murder. It's only later--as he starts to learn he does have emotions and does feel empathy, and you'll notice fewer murders--that his domestic life becomes part of him.

The reason they connected, though neither ever realized it(she less than he, though) was that Rita was always doing the same thing as he, only for different reasons. For normal reasons: for the sake of her children, and to assure a happy life for herself as well, after a great deal of suffering and obvious shame(even when happy she always looked a second before or after tears) that drove her from being part of normal society, at least, certainly, in her own mind. So she tries to learn what a normal person does. She tries to improve herself, move into the middle class, live in a nice house in a nice place, be married, reset her life. And not completely comfortably for her; imitating something till she becomes it. The self-help, Oprah kinds of things she would say were annoying, but they still did not come from an unreasonable place: the desire to be as good as she could by society's standards. The desire to be accepted after her abusing, junkie husband drove her to rock bottom. The desire to be, at the least, thought a fit mother.

Rita was the version of what Dexter does that normal people pursue. You know, ones that aren't sociopathic killers.

________________________
BUY MY BOOKS AND NEVER DIE

THIS SICKNESS #6 with LULU and GLASS HOUSE on sale now!MARTHA on sale now!


___________________

Labels: , , ,

 
  Sharron Angle, Healthcare Queen

Sharron Angle, the shame of Nevada, recently expressed her anger that she, somehow because of Obamacare, had to pay for those shiftless working mothers and their maternity leave. Most health care plans do not cover maternity leave, actually, and neither does "Obamacare." That's a matter between the mother and the company she works for. But never mind. It annoys her, this thing that doesn't happen, because, I suppose, it just irritates her when anything is made easier on mothers. At least now that those days are far behind her after two children and 61 years. In fact, she did mention that, because a thought can't remain in her head for all the wind blowing it toward her mouth.

Well, at least hypothetically it would bother her, because she herself pays for nothing. Her husband worked for the federal Bureau of Land Management. In his retirement, he's still on his government health plan. And as his wife, so is she.

So she pays for no one's maternity leave, but we all pay for her healthcare.

Labels: , , , ,

 
  It's Not Like Obama Had Reason To Think the GOP Would Be His Friends...

No, Rolling Stone interviewed him early in his presidency and he said he was fully aware their plan was to slow him down, stall him, block him. He knew full well.


He knew from the start they were going to block everything he did. A smart president, knowing that, would look at his solid majorities, write off the GOP, and move forward. But this appears not to be a smart president, because he kept trying to win them over; so focused was he on being the president of people who didn't vote for him too that he ended up being ONLY their president as far as his focus, but they didn't want him. He's George Costanza trying to win over that girlfriend of Jerry's that didn't like him. Obama: they were never going to like you, ever.

He was fully aware of this. He said so. And yet he gave them ground he never had to give them. And now he has none of his own. This is unforgivable political stupidity--especially from a Chicago politician. His opponents mention the city as a way of implying he's sleazy or corrupt. No, if this were a real Chicago politician, he would at least be effective. He would have bulldozed right past them. This man has no bone in his back.

And now all that time is wasted and gone. I don't care that it was lost to him. But it was lost, by him, to us. And he blames us? He actually can find the nerve for that, but not to even stop one single Republican senator from holding up all legislation from now till the election? Obama, they're fucking with you, and have been from the start, and I imagine they can't stop laughing at you and what an easy mark you turned out to be for the most unscrupulous political bullies in America.

We didn't fail Obama. He failed us. It's tragic. And we'll pay the price, not him.

Unless he continues to press overtly--one hopes it's not too late in the game--like this.



Now--where has this been hiding?

For that matter, why do we not see more Democratic ads like this one, hammered in the Republicans' flushed piggy fascist faces till election day?

Labels: , , , , , ,

 
  Obama: Dissatisfied Voters Are Irresponsible

Fresh off yesterday's revelation of Biden's contempt for the base is this from Obama. What's next, White House? Will you call us a bunch of pussies? How much blame are you setting up your base to absorb for the losses you seem to want? Why do you think whipping up actual enthusiasm is beneath you?

You're mad as hell at the voters. If you keep it up, no worries: you won't have to take it anymore.

Blame us as much as you like. Me, I just wish there were a viable third party that actually stood a chance. I'd vote for them. We can do better than cowards and bastards who both despise their voters. As it is I must vote for the Democrats, because as disappointed as I am with the Democrats I don't think the solution is political suicide.

Unlike the Democrats.

Tell you what, Obama, Biden, and the rest: YOU stop whining about your base and do something positive to get them to the polls. These messages:

"Coulda been worse"
"We tried but government is hard"
"Who else you gonna vote for?"

...are going to get you destroyed. We're not one big abused wife. We're not doormats. Stop treating us as though we were.

Labels: , ,

 
27 September 2010
  Biden Turns On The Charm: "Stop Whining" His Only Answer to Democratic Base

So what is the Democratic way to shore up its base? Is it to give them anything, at all, they thought they were voting for? Is it to stand up, just once, to the Republicans? Is it to stop the war in Afghanistan? Or close Guantanamo? Or create a health care law with any teeth in it? To fight for the end of DADT or for middle class tax relief? Or create any jobs?

No, it's to insult us, and basically say, "What are you gonna do, vote Republican?"

Biden attended a fundraiser for Rep. Paul Hodes, who is running for the Senate; Rep. Carol Shea-Porter, who is seeking re-election to a third term; and the state Democratic Party. He said Democrats can win both races if they draw clear distinctions between themselves and their Republican opponents, and he urged Democrats to "remind our base constituency to stop whining and get out there and look at the alternatives. This president has done an incredible job. He's kept his promises."
Translated: You're our bitch. Now keep sucking it.

The GOP couldn't be presenting a more monstrous alternative, and the Democrats couldn't be throwing this away more.

It's now obvious you guys haven't any more respect for your voters than the GOP. Maybe less. At least the GOP knows it needs them.

FUCK YOU, BIDEN. Does it occur to you many simply may not vote? I still will. Plenty of others aren't as stupid as I am, though.

Labels: , ,

 
25 September 2010
  Why Do Democrats Want To Throw Away Power?

This election. These Democrats. It's theirs to lose. Seriously, if the Democrats weren't scared of their own shadow, the GOP really couldn't be making this easier for them. Look at the monstrous GOP candidates.

Actually, you can't help it, because the Democrats themselves are barely making us aware who their own are, preferring in ads to weakly (if at all) attack the other side, but also merely increasing the opponents' name visibility at the expense of their own most of the time. Tell me who's running against Joe Miller or Christine O'Donnell without looking it up. But I'll bet you can name three more Republican candidates besides the two I just mentioned without a problem. Well, that is a problem, isn't it?

This week, the Democrats decided, as they did with DADT the week before, to give up without a fight on the issue of giving the middle class tax cuts. Because somehow they thought giving most voters tax cuts would hurt them in the election. They fear the ads. But they also forget that now the Republicans can run whatever speculative ads they wish on the issue and the Democrats can only counter that they gave up. Once the GOP takes power again they will immediately make the Bush upper-bracket tax cuts permanent, and the Democrats will have lost the chance forever. Why? They think they have a good thing going with all these crazy GOP candidates and why rock the boat? The Democrats think people are pleased with them and that they barely have to campaign. The Democrats, in short, are letting this happen, because fighting for anything seems beneath them. Perhaps too political? They're happy to leave the fighting to the Republicans. No one ever lost, they assume, by relying on the informed voter to take up the slack.

And now the final piss on our heads: the Republicans, who have obscured everything that was in the health reform act to the point that--well, I couldn't tell you what's in it exactly and be sure without a cheat sheet; will now take credit for all the stuff they made sure people didn't know about the act. Much of which took effect this week, not that you'd know, because the White House barely said anything about it, as though they're ashamed of having made it so kids can't be taken off the plan, or so pre-existing conditions can't prevent you from getting a policy. Because people would hate to know that.

And the Democrats, who failed to educate the public about the act or to take any credit for it in any visible way, will...lose. They will lose. They lost this week, possibly, with the tax cut vote, which proved that, even with a popular issue the other side might have caved on, they have no will to fight and don't even seem to take their precious majority--which will be in nicely unused mint condition when given to the GOP, who will then begin with wiping their asses with it--seriously.

I think we're done already, though everyone should vote just the same. I hope not, but I think we are.

One side are evil bastards, the other are weak, cowardly, and perhaps just stupid. I don't like where that leads us. I don't like that Obama has been so feckless that not only is he defaulting the country back to the people who wrecked it, but to the worst version of it in my lifetime. I imagine the Republicans themselves have trouble believing how easy he's making this for them.

And Democrats can attack me for saying all this, and blame people like me for undermining the president when the election is lost. But I still intend to vote. You enablers who only try to shut up your own side, it's your fault the Democratic Party's unwarranted, lazy overconfidence will lose the election, if it's anyone's on this side.

Labels: , , , , ,

 
  Rahm Leaves But Obama Still Thinks They Can Make Friends With the GOP

"...One thing that has come up in my conversations with people in a position to know is that Obama's next chief of staff will likely be geared toward finding ways to work with Republicans."

Oh Jesus. No change then. I can believe this, however.

Look, Obama, they're just not that into you.

Don't work with them. They will not return the gesture except with a single finger.

Work around and past them. Figure this out before it's too late. They only want to do two things with you: stall you till they take back the government, made easier by said stalling creating the perception(not entirely unjustified) that you haven't done anything; paralyze you into indecision, or worse, capitulation. Both have been accomplished.

They're about to make you the lamest of ducks. And I do not even want to think about a worse possibility: what the combination of a Republican speaker of the House(a position third in line to the presidency), and the violent feelings the GOP and the Teashirts have been stirring up against the president, could result in.

Labels: , , , , , ,

 
10 September 2010
  Sharron Angle, the Blustering Coward

Sharron "Just Vote For Me You Assholes" Angle seems to not realize that when she says things, people remember them afterward. Or rather, she hates that they do, because she doesn't, perhaps. Every time anyone asks her a question about one of her bits of bluster, she must like this as much as a drunk being asked about all the crap they did Saturday night when they were blitzed.

So she challenges Harry Reid to a debate. Reid quickly and eagerly accepts. Angle reacts like the coward she is and backs out almost as quickly and eagerly.

Because can't you just picture it? She goes on and on with her shrill paranoia and then Reid asks her about something having to do with Nevada's real problems. She gets flustered and either freezes like Jan Brewer, or even better, throws a tantrum, screaming and stamping her feet, maybe even threatening Reid's life as she already has in a veiled way. All in front of everyone, on camera.

I really wish she hadn't backed out. I would pay to see the last thread of sanity or composure on which she still hangs snap--well, before she gets any position of power, anyway.

Fear of debating their opponents, by the way, has been a bit of a trend in Republican candidates in this election.

Labels: , , , ,

 
"Eternity with Beelzebub, and all his hellish instruments of death, will be a picnic compared to five minutes with me and this pencil." - E. Blackadder, 1791
JLRoberson Self-Portrait 2005.
Questionable words & pictures from John Linton Roberson

SUPPORT MY SINFUL WORK AT PATREON!

Become a Patron!
ALSO FROM THIS WHICH IS US


LULU Book 1 by John Linton Roberson introduction by Martin Pasko
LULU Book 1(2013) 
with an introduction by Martin Pasko

Amazon | Createspace | Comixology


Features:
Frank Wedekind's LULU
SUZY SPREADWELL
VLADRUSHKA (adults only)
STORY OF OH!(2008) Written by Charles Alverson (adults only)
MARTHA(2009)

COMICS
WORDS
PORTFOLIO
CONTACT
TWITTER
FACEBOOK
COMIXOLOGY
AMAZON
GOOGLE PLAY
CREATESPACE STORE
DEVIANTART GALLERY
PRINTS & MORE


Interviews/Discussions:

ROBB ORR
April 2013: LULU Book 1 Interview at Comics Forge

DECONSTRUCTING COMICS
My appearances on the greatest comics podcast there is.

July 2017: The New Mature Flintstones
Discussion with Tim Young and series artist Steve Pugh.

December 2016: Politics in Comics
Discussion with Emmet O'Cuana.

November 2016: Wonder Woman - Earth-One and Before
Discussion with Emmet O'Cuana.


April 2016: Batman v. Superman -  An Assassination

Discussion with Kumar Sivasubramanian and Emmet O'Cuana.


October 2015: Censorship of...Me! (Among Others)
Interview by Tim Young.
Also starring Dale Lazarov & Tim PIlcher.


August 2014:
Crumb’s Confounding “Genesis”

Discussion with Tim Young

April 2014: Corporate Comics: Love 'Em, Hate 'Em
Discussion in Sack's Coffee, Berkeley with Tim Young, Deb Aoki, and Jason McNamara.


April 2013:
Lulu”- Staging a classic on paper
Interview by Tim Young.

August 2012: Flex Mentallo
Discussion with Troy Belford.


January 2012: Comics Events
Discussion with Tim Young


May 2011: Theatre and Comics
Interview by Tim Young




JOEY MANLEY
August 2006 at Talkaboutcomics.com

AUSTIN ENGLISH 
Sept. 2001 at Spark-Online



BUY MY BOOKS OR CATS WILL EAT YOU










Stuff About My Work







All content ©2017 John Linton Roberson and accomplices. All rights reserved.

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]


Archives
October 2002 / November 2002 / February 2003 / March 2003 / April 2003 / May 2003 / June 2003 / July 2003 / August 2003 / September 2003 / October 2003 / November 2003 / January 2004 / February 2004 / March 2004 / April 2004 / May 2004 / July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 / August 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / January 2011 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / May 2011 / June 2011 / July 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / October 2011 / November 2011 / December 2011 / January 2012 / February 2012 / March 2012 / April 2012 / May 2012 / June 2012 / July 2012 / August 2012 / September 2012 / October 2012 / November 2012 / December 2012 / January 2013 / February 2013 / March 2013 / April 2013 / May 2013 / June 2013 / July 2013 / August 2013 / September 2013 / October 2013 / November 2013 / December 2013 / January 2014 / February 2014 / March 2014 / April 2014 / May 2014 / June 2014 / July 2014 / August 2014 / October 2014 / December 2014 / February 2015 / March 2015 / June 2015 / July 2015 / August 2015 / September 2015 / October 2015 / November 2015 / December 2015 / January 2016 / February 2016 / March 2016 / April 2016 / June 2016 / July 2016 / August 2016 / November 2016 / December 2016 / January 2017 / February 2017 / April 2017 / May 2017 / June 2017 / July 2017 / August 2017 / September 2017 /