LULU by John Linton Roberson (c) 2012.
I Didn't Write That!
30 September 2004
  Round One To Kerry Round One To Kerry

"By not allowing himself to be reduced to tears, the president was a big winner tonight."
Rob Cordry, The Daily Show

Ohhh...I'm feeling much better tonight.

It's true, as Jon Stewart remarked, that the two sides of the debate seemed like competing campaign speeches--which indeed they are--but there was quite a distinct difference between the impressions formed by either candidate's performance this evening. This was aided by the networks, apparently, doing what I thought they were only doing on pundit-free, raw C-Span, on which I was watching. I feared if I watched any other source I would hear pundits mumbling color commentary all the way through.

When I watch presidential debates, the only one allowed to talk over the candidates with spontaneous commentary is me, dammit. I do tend to get over-excited and shout at the screen--I'm told this is very amusing to observe, assuming one isn't interested in paying very close attention to the debate. The presidential debates are to me what the Super Bowl is to others, but I only get to see it once every four years.

So I opted for the closest thing I could get to a raw feed, but as it turned out this was a joke--it turns out Fox News was handling the cameras and distributing the feeds. Tonight's debate was purely on foreign policy, and going in, the media poodles seemed to have thought for reasons passing understanding that Bush would have the advantage. That seems to assume Bush has any foreign policy successes beyond "we're makin' progress" to declare.

On C-Span the debate was split-screen. There apparently are 32 pages of rules worked out between the campaigns, and it seems that split screen was against said rules, which no network signed onto. Some also had to do with podium height--specifically that they be exactly equal. The split screen, however, would appear from the first long two-shot seen at the beginning to only emphasize a salient fact: Bush looks short and puny and Kerry looks tall and presidential. They attempted to rectify this in the split screen by lining up the tops of their heads, which only made Bush look shorter and more hunched. They say that height alone is usually enough to decide a presidential race.

So glamour points go to Kerry, not just for that, or for not raising his voice even once while Bush did a number of times(more about that in a bit) but for a later moment where Bush attempted to get chummy, saying that he wanted to "put a leash on" his daughters. Both had a nice little laugh about that, followed by the only moment they smiled at the same time--making Bush's attempt at looking charming backfire. Bush really didn't want us to see these alongside one another. Kerry had a nice, very white smile(almost sanded--you shouldn't look directly at it, it'll scar your retinas) while Bush came off looking every inch the chimp. One wonders how a man with a full mouth of teeth still manages every time he grins to look like the village idiot Gummy Jethro. A man who hides his teeth a lot when he smiles has something to hide in his mouth.

For Kerry's part as far as the substance of the debate, he did pretty much the least one should expect from a presidential candidate. Bullet point after bullet point, tightly organized and reasoned, finally articulating the difference between his view and Dubya's on Iraq, best summed up thusly:

KERRY: I have a plan to win the peace in Iraq. Bush went in without a plan, and worse, directed resources away from getting Bin Laden, the actual person that attacked us.

BUSH: Ben who?...My plan was fine, is fine, and it's going fine, and to say otherwise is insulting our great ally Poland and depress our fighting men and women, none of whose funerals I've attended but your brains will go all warm and fuzzy as I tell you a made-up story about a war widow I had a laugh with named Missy. What, I have to answer the question? (huff) Jeezus, is this boring. (sniff) Damn, I hope this itch on my cheek ain't another boil. Hell, is that thing on?

Bush clearly wasn't aware that the entire thing would be broadcast split-screen not just by dull ol' C-Span, but by most of the major networks--including Fox. If he had, he would certainly have been much more circumspect in his huffy reactions during Kerry's time, which were a fascinating sight throughout. One wonders if the networks picked this exact moment to fuck Bush. The punditsphere--even Fox--was very quick to give Kerry the victory, and surprised at Bush's terrible performance. Relentlessly throughout he displayed what several Hardball commentators referred to as a "monarchical" air.

He looked impatient, annoyed, a bit irritable at having to be at this debate at all and quite obviously looking upon it as a formality to be gotten through. Just like his disastrous press conference last spring, he robotically repeated the talking points till they all ran together, and seemed miffed when he actually had to elaborate, so repeated them more. And there was one implied excuse after another, on the basis that they're doing the best they can in the waronterruh, but it's "hard work." He said again and again it was "hard work," making you wonder when he'd accompany this with a "whew!" and a wiping of the brow, but this would have shown more obviously that he was sweating. He was going quite red in the forehead toward the end. And pundits quickly compared his "peevishness" to Gore's petulant, condescending 2000 sighs. In fact, Bush sighed a couple of times himself.

He looked desperate and got mad a few times, opening statements with great pissy huffs of impatient breath, as he often does when caught off-guard. Kerry had more than talking points to say. Bush didn't. But he did get a number of things across. He implied that he didn't particularly care about getting the troops home "just to get 'em home." He pretty much said that Hussein, not Bin Laden, was the great financier of terrorism. (Bin Laden does not do actions himself--he funds them like a venture capitalist. So this is a particularly telling confusion, if confusion it is) He chided Kerry for daring criticize his handling of the war, calling the war "the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time"--in fact, repeating it so many times that one might start to take it as his own view if one didn't know better--and a "grand diversion," because it would lower troop morale. (One imagines getting killed for no reason lowers it even more) Apparently despite that Homeland Security is alarmingly incompetent, at least it's got a "lot of good people working hard." (Most of us would prefer a lot of efficient people working intelligently, but this is the century of lowered experctations) He also defended attacking Iraq rather than concentrating efforts on Bin Laden by saying "Bin Laden doesn't get to decide" who or when we attack.

That's right, Bush saw through Bin Laden's crafty attempt to divert us toward attacking and killing him by attacking our country, and Bush attacked Iraq instead just to show him who's boss.

About this, Kerry had a pretty good comeback, to the effect that attacking Iraq in response to 9/11 was akin to FDR declaring war on Mexico in response to Pearl Harbor. Another was in reference to the fact that the first and most important thing our armed forces secured in Iraq, long before we ever bothered with the government offices, utilities, or museums or what have you, was the oil. From this fact, Kerry said, one might get the impression, if one is an Iraqi, that "well, maybe they're just after our oil."

In his father's case we'd expect all the self-pity and petulance One finds that Bush has become far too used to the hermetic environments protected by loyalty oaths that his handlers have arranged across the US like something between birthday parties and cult meetings. He gets so surprisingly angry at any question he's unprepared for. And the next debate is purely about domestic policy, and on that front, Bush has nothing; he has predicated his entire identity as president on foreign policy, and he barely has anything there. But he has been as miserable a failure as can be imagined domestically. Already some supporters are deserting him.

And then there's Edwards vs. Cheney. Strap yourselves in.

Oh, and after the debate, the online donations to the Democratic Party suddenly started coming in at the rate of five per second.

Labels: ,


Post a Comment

<< Home
"Eternity in the company of Beelzebub, and all of his hellish instruments of death, will be a picnic compared to five minutes with me & this pencil."
--E. Blackadder, 1789

JLRoberson Self-Portrait 2005.
Questionable words & pictures from John Linton Roberson

FOR MATURE READERS in most cases


LULU Book 1 by John Linton Roberson introduction by Martin Pasko
LULU Book 1 (2013) 
with an introduction by Martin Pasko

Amazon | Createspace | Comixology

Frank Wedekind's LULU
VLADRUSHKA (adults only)
STORY OF OH!(2008) Written by Charles Alverson (adults only)



April 2013: LULU Book 1 Interview at Comics Forge 


New! April 2013: Lulu”- Staging a classic on paper - interview by Tim Young.
August 2012: Flex Mentallo - discussion with Troy Belford.
January 2012: Comics Events - discussion with Tim Young
May 2011: Theatre and Comics - interview by Tim Young.

August 2006 at

Sept. 2001 at Spark-Online


Stuff About My Work

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

October 2002 / November 2002 / February 2003 / March 2003 / April 2003 / May 2003 / June 2003 / July 2003 / August 2003 / September 2003 / October 2003 / November 2003 / January 2004 / February 2004 / March 2004 / April 2004 / May 2004 / July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 / August 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / January 2011 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / May 2011 / June 2011 / July 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / October 2011 / November 2011 / December 2011 / January 2012 / February 2012 / March 2012 / April 2012 / May 2012 / June 2012 / July 2012 / August 2012 / September 2012 / October 2012 / November 2012 / December 2012 / January 2013 / February 2013 / March 2013 / April 2013 / May 2013 / June 2013 / July 2013 / August 2013 / September 2013 / October 2013 / November 2013 / December 2013 / January 2014 / February 2014 / March 2014 / April 2014 / May 2014 / June 2014 / July 2014 / August 2014 / October 2014 / December 2014 / February 2015 / March 2015 / June 2015 / July 2015 / August 2015 / September 2015 / October 2015 / November 2015 / December 2015 / January 2016 / February 2016 / March 2016 / April 2016 / June 2016 / July 2016 / August 2016 / November 2016 / December 2016 / April 2017 / May 2017 / June 2017 / July 2017 / August 2017 / September 2017 / October 2017 / January 2018 / March 2018 / April 2018 / May 2018 / June 2018 / July 2018 / August 2018 / September 2018 / October 2018 / November 2018 / December 2018 / January 2019 / February 2019 / March 2019 / June 2019 / October 2019 / March 2020 / April 2020 / August 2020 / October 2020 / November 2020 /

Powered by Blogger